Save yourselves from this pious viper she is capricious and dismissive but not in a fun sexy way in a get ya for every dollar and hang up early then lie about it in a sociopathic way ;)
Hung up a third of the way through the call first saying she was called to work and later denying that she hung up early
Manipulation mania
Initially defused
Subsequently confused
Ultimately meant to frustrate clients into exhaustion and acceptance of her lack of commitment to uphold obligations as agreed thus a contractual malformation tantamount to a breach of tacit covenants if not quickly resolved may constitute unbundling and obligatory cancellations in addition to customer attrition an -unsustainable business model in any case , that will cost other performers future earnings as well as lower the value of the entire network a stupendously stupid degradation of profitability opportunities and loss of brand confidence - good luck guys and gals but I feel like this is to common and the demonstrative lack of good faith leaves me feeling discontent this is a case of fruit from the poisonous tree ... hope to be reimbursed quickly or I will be forced to choose whom will burden the loss me at 15 or sc at 100. Hum should I be responsible for spillage business costs due to the gross negligence of a contacted sc representative? I don’t know what to do it’s only 15 but it’s still a pernicious form of robbery that presupposes inaction on my part so it is really the principle and not the extent
Still now I have brought this to your attention so plausible deniability can no longer provision a lack of response and will be constituted as an avoidance tactic, and more likely than not case state suggesting an act of commission projected as omission (either or , it’s still bad faith)
To end this letter of contention with a burden or response within 24 hrs of this post
5:12 PM
Saturday, September 22, 2018 (EDT)
Time in Greenwich Village, New York, NY
